课件编号20207713

2024年高考英语核心考点讲练(新高考专用)考点4 阅读理解主旨大意之段落大意(教师版+学生版)

日期:2024-05-19 科目:英语 类型:高中试卷 查看:46次 大小:277725Byte 来源:二一课件通
预览图 0
考点,高考,大意,2024年,主旨,教师
    考点4 阅读理解 主旨大意之段落大意(核心考点精讲精练) 1. 2021-2023年三年高考真题考点分布 考点 题型 段落大意 阅读理解 2023 试卷类型 设问 考点 2023浙江1月高考 C篇31.What can we learn from the last paragraph 段落大意 2023·新高考I卷 D篇32.What is Paragraph 2 of the text mainly about 段落大意 2022 2022·新高考I卷 阅读D14. What is paragraph 5 mainly about 段落大意 2022·全国甲卷 D 阅读D32. What is the first paragraph mainly about 段落大意 2021 2021年全国乙卷 B篇24. What does paragraph 2 mainly tell us about mobile phones 段落大意 2021年6月浙江卷 C篇10. What is the last paragraph mainly about 段落大意 2. 命题规律及备考策略 【命题规律】近3年新高考卷对于阅读理解中段落大意的考查共计6次,主要考查: 根据阅读文章中的某一段落,概括段落大意。概括段落大意的方法:1.利用主题句;2.没有主题句,总结段落大意。 【备考策略】系统归类段落大意的总结方法,尤其是主题句、同义句表达的技巧;熟练掌握阅读技能。 【命题预测】 2024年阅读理解对段落大意的考查仍然是重点。 【2024年高考命题预测】 主旨大意之段落大意考点是高考中的必考点。一篇文章有多个段落,为什么把题出在其中的某个段落?因为这个段落在文章中起着至关重要的作用,这些段落或引出话题或承上启下或总结全文。命题者的意图是明确的,他们着眼于文章中起重要作用的段落进而设题。预测在2024高考中,段落大意题会继续在高考阅读理解中呈现。 【主旨大意之段落大意考点指南】 段落大意题常考问题: The main point /idea of the passage is… The passage is mainly about… The passage mainly discusses… The last but one paragraph is chiefly concerned with… Which of the following statements best expresses the main idea of the passage 近几年高考段落大意考查的特点: 考查的段落一般没有主题句,这需要考生对整段进行归纳,找出段落的重点,总结段落大意。 [2023·新高考全国Ⅰ卷] D On March 7, 1907, the English statistician Francis Galton published a paper which illustrated what has come to be known as the“wisdom of crowds” effect. The experiment of estimation he conducted showed that in some cases,the average of a large number of independent estimates could be quite accurate. This effect capitalizes on the fact that when people make errors, those errors aren’t always the same. Some people will tend to overestimate, and some to underestimate. When enough of these errors are averaged together, they cancel each other out, resulting in a more accurate estimate. If people are similar and tend to make the same errors, then their errors won’t cancel each other out. In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that people’s estimates be independent. If for whatever reasons, people’s errors become correlated or dependent,the accuracy of the estimate will go down. But a new study led by Joaquin Navajas offered an interesting twist(转折) on this classic phenomenon. The key finding of the study was that when crowds were further divided into smaller groups that were allowed to have a discussion, the averages from these groups were more accurate than those from an equal number of independent individuals. For instance, the average obtained from the estimates of four ... ...

    ~~ 您好,已阅读到文档的结尾了 ~~